this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
-3 points (42.9% liked)

UK Politics

4390 readers
92 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Saw someone the other day saying Labour is the only party that will acknowledge that trade offs exist, but also that they keep picking the side of the trade off guaranteed to annoy their voters, which seemed like a pithy summary of politics.

EDIT: I see we're once again failing the simple reading comprehension test.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oeuf@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 hours ago

The author of the article admits that "doing something about it requires deep-rooted changes" and, like him, I suspect a lone wealth tax won't be enough.

So why is he picking on the Greens about it when a wealth tax is just one part of their much broader economic agenda to tackle inequality? This is either lazy journalism or partisan.

That said, it wouldn't hurt the Greens to publicise their whole package more.