this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
165 points (99.4% liked)
Civil Aviation
518 readers
1 users here now
News from civil commercial and noncommercial aviation, videos, discussions, and more.
Basic rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. No posts about military aviation
Avoid any and all posts related to military aviation.
3. No meme posts
No meme posts. Those should go to !aviationmemes@lemm.ee.
4. Instance rules apply
All lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I believe the engine is designed to shear off instead of destroying the wing, so the not destroying the wing part seems to have worked. But I don’t think it’s supposed to shear off at that point.
Did maintenance fail to mount the engine correctly because they were in a rush?
John Browne has a good channel that goes into it with engineering drawings of the pilon. Yea seems designed to separate from the wing to not damage it