this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
166 points (99.4% liked)

Civil Aviation

548 readers
9 users here now

News from civil commercial and noncommercial aviation, videos, discussions, and more.

Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No posts about military aviationAvoid any and all posts related to military aviation.
3. No meme postsNo meme posts. Those should go to !aviationmemes@lemm.ee.
4. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.

Icon attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source: NTSB

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I believe the engine is designed to shear off instead of destroying the wing, so the not destroying the wing part seems to have worked. But I don’t think it’s supposed to shear off at that point.

Did maintenance fail to mount the engine correctly because they were in a rush?

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

John Browne has a good channel that goes into it with engineering drawings of the pilon. Yea seems designed to separate from the wing to not damage it