this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
397 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

77035 readers
2309 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 128 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They are disabling it because the license cost went up 4 cents? Just pass that cost onto the customer. Even if they mark that up several times, I would rather pay that than have my battery drained because I have to software decode a video.

There is still a lot of H.265 content out there. I have many terabytes of it that I don't want to transcode.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not in this case, this is the codec, but still, because it's blocked in acpi, there's no way to enable it again in Windows, even if you pay that dollar. Workaround: install Linux

[–] jim3692@discuss.online 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

blocked in acpi

install Linux

Huh? How could Linux solve an ACPI problem?

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

it ignores that and uses it anyway (according to the comments on the article, i did not test this)