this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
6 points (100.0% liked)

Green Party UK

164 readers
16 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] knowone@slrpnk.net 3 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I don't see this as upholding free speech. It's being painted in the media so far that this is simply about single sex toilets and "making women feel safe". Notice how they never say "cis women". Their choice of words speaks for itself. Should councillors have to listen to overt fascists give their views too? Seeing as they don't "feel safe" around non white people? We know full well these people wouldn't stop at single sex toilets, they just go on about that more than anything cos it's the only thing they can twist into making themselves seem the victim. They'd happily take free speech away from trans people. Underneath, most of them are similar to Graham Linehan

[–] gid@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm really torn about this. I want the Greens to gain more places. I also support Green Party councellors in defending their values in a personal capacity.

But elected leaders are meant to represent, and by extension, listen to all of their constituents. Even those with morally repugnant views. Counsellors walking out of public meetings when someone raises anti-trans talking points is fundamentally incompatible with the democratic framework they were elected within.

Now, personally, I value doing The Right Thing (ie. not giving space to fascist rhetoric) over obeying the rules of the framework, but I empathise with this counsellor's decision. Tactics like this will alienate a lot of potential voters, and if we want the Greens in a place of power to be able to enact systemic change we need to be winning people over, not pushing them away.

That's not to say we should tolerate fascist rhetoric. There are other ways to push back against it than walking out.

[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, but no, you're wrong. You absolutely do not need to give voice to people trying to strip rights from others. Are you familiar with the paradox of tolerance? If you tolerate abhorrent views they will take over.

[–] gid@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I'm familiar, yes. That's why I said I'm torn about this.

There are different ways of showing intolerance of fascist rhetoric. I'm saying that while I support the motives of the counsellors who have walked out, I also empathise with this counsellor who stepped down because of her convictions regarding her duty as an elected official.

load more comments (1 replies)