this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
297 points (97.4% liked)

People Twitter

8547 readers
2368 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 14 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

That's like saying "I refuse to drink wines older than 2000." Just because it's old doesn't mean it's good. But, some of the old ones are very, very good.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

If it's old and people still enjoy consuming it, it's probably good. If it's new and people consume it, it's still unproven. The thing about "classics" isn't that anything old is a classic. Anything that stands the test of time is. Old music wasn't better we just stopped listening to the bad songs. Old books aren't better, we just stopped reading the bad ones. Old movies aren't better, we just stopped watching the bad ones.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I watched Altered States for the first time a few years ago and that one got me more than most modern sci fi. It's a masterpiece imo.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

iirc that movie is like a crazy abstract art film, it's surprising that Hollywood was willing to make it

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

It totally is but it's so engaging! I had trouble paying attention to things like Mad God, but Altered States drew me right in.