this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2025
675 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

76917 readers
3457 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
675
Microsoft AI CEO pushes back against critics after recent Windows AI backlash — "the fact that people are unimpressed ... is mindblowing to me" (www.windowscentral.com)
submitted 20 hours ago by bytesonbike@discuss.online to c/technology@lemmy.world
325 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Microsoft's AI CEO, Mustafa Suleyman, has shared his opinion after recent pushback from users online that are becoming frustrated with Copilot and AI on Windows. In a post on X, Suleyman says he's mind blown by the fact that people are unimpressed with the ability to talk fluently with an AI computer.

His post comes after Windows president Pavan Davuluri was recently met with major backlash from users online for posting about Windows evolving into an agentic OS. His post was so negatively received that he was forced to turn off replies, though Davuluri did later respond to reassure customers that the company was aware of the feedback.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Of course they will never define "fluent". They can't do that because then they'd be proven as lying hacks, or else setting a low bar that was met several years ago.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Fluent seems weaker than valid, which is weaker than sound, philosophically speaking.

It["A.I"]'s like a 2 year old.