this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
575 points (97.5% liked)
Videos
16997 readers
50 users here now
For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!
Rules
- Videos only
- Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
- Don't be a jerk
- No advertising
- No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
- Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
- Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
- Duplicate posts may be removed
- AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^
Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
i suppose it’s an understandable knee jerk reaction to assume that.
….
i wrote it because when i see riots there’s usually “it was anarchy on the streets!” somewhere….
but in this case there was a large number of people who saw someone needing help and decided to help, which is actually anarchy on the streets…
They're both technically anarchic, (no hierarchy among rioters either) but things like this demonstrate the lack of hierarchy is clearly not the problem in either situation.
anarchy isn’t just the lack of hierarchy, it’s an organization of society without hierarchical government.
a riot is chaos, not anarchy.
It's a bit of a semantic grey space, like many words. For common use, anarchy and chaos are synonyms, hence why your initial comment could be read both ways. For a certain class of 'rebellious' individual, it's used more like a naive, 'lower case l' libertarianism. For some, it means the absence of any social structure at all, a 'state of nature.' For some others it's the de facto reality of all systems using a definition of 'who has the most capacity for violence makes the rules.' For those studying sociology and anthropology, it's used specifically for a class of societal organizational systems that may be highly organized but share a lack of hierarchy. The shared element between the various uses is the lack of structure so I lean toward keeping it to that basic concept and hesitate to claim any of them are the 'correct' definition.
the equivocation between chaos and anarchy is a deliberate tactic to malign the philosophy.
if every time there was riots people yelled “there’s communism in the streets!” it wouldn’t change the meaning of the word.
throwing libertarian in there is just nuts so i see this going nowhere.
If enough people use a word to mean something different from what it used to mean, it literally does change the meaning, (e.g. radical meaning 'connected to a plant's roots,' the reason people say 'transwomen are real women.' etc.) but fair enough. Have a nice day.
Anthropologists changed the meaning of gender to refer only to the societal role and not biological sex. Not just from people using it that way, but from scientists who study humans. They needed that word because many societies have gender roles that aren’t strictly tied to sex.
i will have a terrible day, you can’t tell me what to do.
Haha, it was a well-wishing, short for 'I hope you have a nice day,' not a command. Have a nice day.
how could i have a nice day? i’m living in a fascist takeover.
I can't necessarily make a nice day happen for you, I just hope your day goes well to the extent it can.
i do appreciate the well wishing….
but, you can wish in one hand and shit in the other and see which one gets full faster.
And to shit into that hand, first one must have a wish to do so. A wish is precisely as real as fascism or anarchism, and a necessary but not sufficient precursor to any of the above.
sure