Today I Learned
What did you learn today? Share it with us!
We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.
** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**
Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
Partnered Communities
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
Community Moderation
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.
view the rest of the comments
How many of these are actually habitable? I would assume a large portion are either too dilapidated or under renovations.
I very much doubt that nearly a third of the housing stock is vacant for no reason, especially when it's a seller's market. The statistics for people who own more than home or buildings with more than unit are not enough to explain the difference. I'm skeptical of these random no name authors on websites like medium.
I know people here want a sexy quick solution, but the reality is that this country's housing stock is too small, too old, and is not keeping up with demand at all. The one and only solution is to reform zoning laws, expedite housing construction, and pump the market with so many new units that it not only meets demands, but exceeds to the point where prices fall and we have a buyer's market.
27.4 multiplied by the number of homeless people, not 33% of all housing. A recent guess of number of homeless people was 600k, although that is a guess
And habitable is a relative term. I assume someone might not mind subpar housing over sleeping on a bench in the snow
They might not mind the subpar housing, but they would for sure mind the lack of food pantries and medical services in the places the empty housing exists. If it's not dying rural town that completely lacks those things, it's sprawling suburb or vacation community that requires a car to access them.
You go to any country where people have freedom to do whatever the hell they want and you'll see them living in any kind of house. what they call dilapidated in the US is just normal bullshit.
they've got so many fucking laws and regulations in the United States preventing people from being able to build things preventing people from being able to live inside of the place that they work preventing people from having housing preventing people from handing out sandwiches to homeless people. the United States is an authoritarian hell hole
What a bizarre question. You know "homeless" means sleeping on the street, right?
sending the homeless to delapidated abandoned towns is more a genocide than a solution
Who recommended that solution?
...was it you?
it was you, it sounded like being in delapidated abandoned towns is preferable to being in the streets of their communities.
if that wasn't your intent you need to clarify
Hrm, if you regularly have these kinds of issues remembering real life events you might have a memory disorder. My practice is very familiar with them. You or a loved one may want to reach out to a specialist nearby to make sure you get the care you need. Best of luck to you in these trying times. :)
Gorilladruma said they today houses are not fit for human habitation, and you replied what sounded like that is still better than sleeping in the streets.
I might be stupid, but don't gaslight people
Luckily your reading and writing skills are adequate. Media literacy is an internal network of skills comprised of more than just those two abilities however, and it seems like yours is lacking, for you'll find after a quick analysis that I did not say the things that are making you angry. Again, those are yours, which is why I professionally recommend treatment for memory loss. Best of luck :)
if you're vague enough don't get upset if you're misinterpreted.
Vague enough for what?
Wow you read four words today.
Good job, here, have your sippy juice and maybe later you can try and finish reading that sentence.
good boy
You didn't answer my question. When you said, "if you're vague enough" I asked "vague enough for what?" Please let us know what you meant. :)
if you're vague enough don't get upset if you're misinterpreted.
Let's see if you can finish that sentence this time.
It seems I was too generous in my approximation of your reading and writing abilities. I'd recommend returning to your educational facility and asking for a refund but I don't think you paid for it. ciao
No one can be that stupid, this must be a bot