this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
-1 points (42.9% liked)

Libertarian Discussion

337 readers
1 users here now

Place for discussion from a Libertarian perspective, meaning less top-down control and more individual liberty. In general, the intent is discussion about issues and not a discussion on libertarianism itself or any of its branches.

Be sure to respect the instance rules, and please keep discussion civil and backed by high quality sources where possible.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (14 children)

Universal Monk

They're an odd sort of troll.

We’re talking about you being a jerk ... you are a nazi

Could you please cool it? We really don't need these kinds of personal attacks.

I disagree with this person too, but that doesn't make it okay to slander them. Attack arguments, not people.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

When I argue with sugar_in_your_tea, there’s notes. In our previous interaction he kinda defended actual Nazi newspapers

Understood. But when he said that about your conversation with him, I got annoyed, because you've never defended any Nazi newspapers.

But you're right, no need to stoop to their level.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (9 children)

My level being an accurate reference to specific events I'm prepared to source.

When you recognize you were wrong, your beliefs are supposed to change.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think I was wrong. My beliefs haven't changed, and I stand by everything I said. My opinion of you hasn't changed whatsoever. But I also recognize that this isn't my community, so I will abide by the rules. But nah, fam, nothing has changed on my end. :)

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The person in question told you I was right, and you agree with them, but still pretend I'm wrong.

Which is different from the ingroup-based reality I described... somehow.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you are misrepresenting his response, which is something you are prone to do. In fact, he said, "but I do think they’re misrepresenting it."

I won't give my real thoughts on you, as I don't want to go against the rules of the person who runs this community.

Again, I stand by everything I said. My opinion about you hasn't change at all. :)

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

'He kinda did.'

'I kinda did.'

So you're a nazi?

Troll.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“but I do think they’re misrepresenting it.”

And again, I stand by what I said about you, and my opinion hasn't changed at all. But I don't wanna break the rules of this community, so I can say it. But I did say it earlier, and I still believe it. I just won't say it again here.

But don't worry, if I come across you in a more permissive forum, I'll gladly repeat it all. :)

Having said that, I agree with the article posted as well. :)

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's not permissive about this forum? Here's our list of rules:

Be sure to respect the instance rules, and please keep discussion civil and backed by high quality sources where possible.

That's it. This community essentially has no rules. Here's the modlog, there are two entries there, and both are from an admin of this instance.

I haven't picked any other mods because there's no mod burden. I intend to keep the rules very loose to keep it that way, because I value free speech.

[–] EndlessApollo@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wasn't meant as an attack on you or your comm. I just want to call him names and stuff, like he attacks other people in his comments.

You have a great community. But he calls people names, so I'll call him names. Just not here. You and your community have class. I don't. So it's really a matter of me not wanting to disrespect your comm. :)

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah I've already saved this thread for when you lie about me to someone else. Called that in the first comment.

Meanwhile someone in your ingroup admits they did exactly what I said, but they said nuh-uh before repeating exactly what I said they said, so it doesn't count. Again: first comment.

Honestly, thank you for being an uncomplicated example of exactly what I'm talking about. I could put a sticker on your forehead and you'd try rubbing it off the guy in the mirror.

Good. Because again, i stand by everything I said. And thank you for reinforcing exactly what I have always thought of you.

And I also stand by the article I posted. :)

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)