this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
540 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

76917 readers
3229 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Cloudflare spokesperson told Ars that the cloud services provider saw “a spike in unusual traffic to one of Cloudflare’s services,” which “caused some traffic passing through Cloudflare’s network to experience errors.”

“We do not yet know the cause of the spike in unusual traffic,” the spokesperson said. “We are all hands on deck to make sure all traffic is served without errors. After that, we will turn our attention to investigating the cause of the unusual spike in traffic.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz 54 points 1 day ago (4 children)

and it's fucking annoying to check the box to "prove you're a human" when trying to access almost any site. some days it will make me do it three times before letting me through

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I understand the need for anti-bot or DDoS protection, but there are better and free options today. Like Anubis. So please, in the love of The Internet, move away from cloudflare. Ideally yesterday already.

Edit: or run your own decent firewall with geo blocks. FireHOL block lists. Intrusion detection.

Setting up fail2ban. . Etc. Etc.

[–] Xylight@lemdro.id 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Anubis isn't even comparable to cloudflare. The reason cloudflare is so effective is that they can oversee which IPs are spamming or being abusive to certain websites, and can throw up protections quickly. There are a number of negative implications that come with this, but it's quite good at its primary job.

Anubis is just a prompt that wastes CPU cycles and tries to make it more expensive for AI crawlers to do so (since they care a lot about compute costs, of course). There is no bot protection or anything happening. The "making sure you're not a bot" is quite misleading imo

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anubis is to protect against scraping from LLMs, it has nothing to do with DDoS protection. Not only that, but the Anubis Github repo recommends most people to use Cloudflare instead, since Anubis is the "nuclear" option.

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 1 day ago

Well then we are all fked. I recommend then using a good internet connection to host your stuff behind it. I also recommend a good firewall.

A firewall that can block on geo location. Block on ASN level. And intrusion detection. And also use block lists like FireHOL level 1 to 4.

Of course configure fail2ban etc.

Again we really need to come up with alternatives now.. I'm sick of how the current internet develops.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

Anubis never worked for me on mobile. I'm afraid of mass adoption if that won't be fixed.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He still doesn't know, guys 😅

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 7 points 1 day ago

It isn't just annoying, it often breaks for people on less-popular browsers. Plus, it requires you to run Cloudflare's Javascript. You think this outage was bad—what do you think would happen if someone slipped them a bit of malware?

[–] modular950@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

next time you're at bat against one of these, you may try moving less diligently / efficiently to the checkbox. overall, a slowed and less exact approach. I've not tested this enough to REALLY say it makes a difference, but in cases where I continually fail, going slower does seem to be the time I finally get through.

I find the same for the picture puzzles where you select images that match or apply to the posted context or whatever else the mission may be.