Entertainment

Sure, but then the AI reproduces it on demand for others without giving any sort credit, often generating profit for either end user or owner. Unless you're arguing that's fair use, I don't see how you get around that violating copyright. If I take somebody else's work and pass it off as something I made you would likely treat that much less favourably, and I think that's just another reflection of how we culturally permit the biased application of law to capital interests; Sam Altman himself publicly stated if he had to acknowledge copyright in the operation of his AI model (the same as every other major LLM owner) it wouldn't be a viable product, which translates to "if I can't steal this property I can't make my billions of dollars". You either care about property rights or you don't, or you're fine with a multi-tiered legal system, which I'd say is no law at all.