this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

Wild Feed

119 readers
29 users here now

A catch-all world journalism hub for news, reports, blogs, editorials, and more.

Rules:

  1. Be cool to each other. Instance rules apply.

  2. All posts should link to a current* blog, article, editorial, listicle, research paper, or something that can be considered "news."

  3. Post title should be the article title or best fit.

  4. No blatant misinformation.

Tags: Not required unless the post fits under one of the below categories.

*[OLD - (year)] For old but relevant articles. Use your best judgement.

[Conspiracy Tuesday] Conspiracy theories/occult themes/cryptids/pseudoscience. Only on Tuesdays.

A more serious community for Independent Journalism — https://lemmy.today/c/Independent_Media

founded 4 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 

For decades, amateur astronomers have railed against light pollution — the single greatest negative impact of humans on the night sky. Initially, the argument was, “We can’t see the stars anymore!” More studies revealed how Artificial Light At Night (ALAN) is detrimental to sleep patterns and causes fatigue and stress in both humans and animals. Could things actually get worse? Indeed, the answer is “yes.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuantumTickle@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Another? This is my primary reason!

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah there basically no rual areas that I can find near me. Hell even Yellowstone didn't get a great view of stars due to light pollution.