Fuck Cars

13776 readers

733 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be Civil

You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speech

Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass people

Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topic

This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No reposts

Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

[meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
[article] for news articles
[blog] for any blog-style content
[video] for video resources
[academic] for academic studies and sources
[discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
[meme] for memes
[image] for any non-meme images
[misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories

Recommended communities:

!yimby@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

toaster@slrpnk.net

grue@lemmy.world

Toaster1@lemmy.world

360

Major cities around the world (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by sixeyo@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A recent study of mode share (the % share of transportation trips by car, transit, walking, biking etc) relative to city size and income levels in almost 800 cities in 61 countries.

Data corresponding to 794 cities, with a combined population of almost 850 million people, is used to model the vast heterogeneities in the way people move in cities.

Some urban areas rely heavily on cars, with less than 10% of their journeys on alternative modes of transport (either walking, cycling or Public Transport), whilst in other cities, less than one in four journeys are by car. Among the 794 cities, 22.4% of the journeys are Active mobility, 26.2% are Public Transport, and 51.4% are by Car.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412024001272

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is a standard type of graph:

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yours is labeled in a much clearer way.

[–] huppakee@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago

Totally agree, the graph in my eyes is pretty clear it is the labeling that is shitty because it tries too hard to be clear. There is the letters of each point (A, B and C) which get the largest heading, but because they are only one letter long they do not appear as the main information. Then there is the description of each axis as second heading acompanied by symbols that do not really add anything, and then the discription of each point as a third heading which just float around in a random spot. Chaos.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Loam drives more, whereas clay either walks or takes the metro?

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago

clay is just as likely to drive as to catch public transport