this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
343 points (99.7% liked)

Privacy

7673 readers
214 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

From a post here two days ago: https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/this-is-a-political-deception-new-chat-control-convinces-lawmakers-but-not-privacy-experts-yet

I guess this is an addendum to this proposal to clarify that these rules dont classify as making scanning mandatory.

[–] wiegell@feddit.dk 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yea i read that, but isn’t this post about that not being an issue anymore?? // Edit: I mean in particular Patrick Breyer was been critical about the revised proposal, so him posting this now suggests that something new has happened?

Yes and the new thing that happened is the section "17a" shown in this post i would assume.