this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
324 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

77164 readers
2744 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Security vulnerabilities are different

No, it's still open source work, completely voluntary in the free world.

Disclosures are often used so people are aware that they’re using libraries that the maintainer has refused to patch

No, they merely tell reality: an unresolved security issue was found. How anyone handles that is their business. There is no inherent duty.

People who would rather write a fix than write & maintain their own daunting library will send a fix.

could lose actual funding they get

If someone's getting paid, and it's not worth the work, then that is also their business. It's still open source. If the solution saves more effort than doing it yourself, then the people who need it won't just let it all go to waste.

This is entirely a social issue of managing & rebuffing unrealistic expectations. It's perfectly valid to set boundaries, remind folks beggars can't be choosers, and tell them pitching in gets more done.