this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
389 points (95.6% liked)

memes

18078 readers
1121 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I dont see how it could be plausible, given the photo apparently predates gen AI

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 22 points 6 days ago

That’s not how plausible deniability works. They create a tool that can make highly realistic graphics and then claim the real photos, when released, are just AI slop.

[–] Rhyfel@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

That doesn't matter to the right, as long as they have something they can lie about they will

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Because there’s no way to fake the data that determines a photos age?…. or they just refute any chain of custody with regards to any actual photos. The conservatives would just scream fake or AI regardless of the actual truth and that would be the end of it.

[–] starman2112@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

How can you tell if a photo you see predates generative AI? Anyone can slap a "2009-10-15" in the metadata

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 1 points 6 days ago

I mean, there's not really any way to prove that