this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2025
30 points (61.7% liked)

Privacy

3529 readers
271 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Proton is considering recycling old email addresses that still receive misdirected mail and appear in breach data, raising serious privacy concerns.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scholar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

I'm sure proton would clear the inboxes before making the addresses available, so there's no risk of seeing legitimate mail meant for someone else.

In terms of misdirected mail there are two types:

  1. Mistyped email addresses
    where a user has made a typo when entering their email somewhere
  2. Randomly typed email addresses
    where a user entered a random email when signing up for a service they didn't care about

Both of these can affect any existing email address (so proton's plans make no difference), and only type 1 could be a privacy risk.

Email addresses aren't secret, nor are they personally identifiable (unless they contain your name or are linked with other personal information) so I don't see a problem here.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Wouldn't the security risk be that if someone thinks the old user is still using that email address, or forgets, they may mistakenly send sensitive into to the person who now has the address...?

Am I missing something?

[–] popcar2@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Have you read the article? These are old bot accounts that have been disabled for almost a decade. It's in the very first line.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Nope, I didn't, thank you for correcting me :)

I'm a lot better about reading the article than I used to be but sometimes I still don't and just wanna chat about stuff with folks, and in this case that's my bad

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)