this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

Fedigrow

579 readers
1 users here now

To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

Resources:

Megathreads:

Rules:

  1. Be respectful
  2. No bigotry

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi all. I was excited when I saw a new Dead by Daylight community was created and I've been trying to post daily to get it going. Its not my community, but I would love to have a thriving Dead by Daylight community on the Fediverse.

Some Dead by Daylight game content can be mature in theme, and I marked some posts as NSFW because I thought they might be a bit borderline, but I also noticed those posts I did mark as NSFW saw almost no interaction. Not even from the community owner. I suspect the issue is the NSFW flag and I second guessed and removed it, but I wanted to hear perspectives from others on that. Is violent game content worth marking NSFW? Should I just wait and see if anybody is bothered? Does marking things NSFW limit their growth a great deal?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

NSFW content will see low/no interaction because of the restrictive default settings of clients (especially on mobile). NSFW won't show up by default, there's no notice about it being filtered, and the settings for the filter are either tucked away deep in the specific client settings or don't even exist... For example, I'm using Interstellar on iOS, and ALL NSFW are filtered, with no option to turn it off - and the fedia.io option of "hide NSFW", even though I disabled it, doesn't apply.

And most users won't be bothered to go this far to see content they don't even know about. I'd guesstimate a good 80% of your visitors will be in the same predicament, not seeing NSFW thus not knowing about it thus not bothering to look for it thus never seeing content you mark as such.

And in my opinion, this simple binary toggle isn't even the right ah of filtering content. For example, I don't mind "sensitive" content that isn't explicitly sexual in my main feed. A lot of topics I'd like to read about can be considered "sensitive", aka "hide from your kids", but isn't generally problematic even in a work environment. On the other hand I do mind sexual content on my feed that makes it impossible to use the Fediverse at work, especially when the client has no option to quickly disable/enable showing these types of posts.

A better option would be a type selection for the "sensitive" marker, with explicit topics like "content warning: sexual assault" or "sexual content" or "content warning: dead bodies depicted" etc., then let the users filter based on what they're comfortable with. Grouping everything under a "sensitive content" label just makes it worse because you can't know what's gonna be under the blur - a penis? a dead body? a rotting corpse?

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is a good point. Labels might be tough in terms of new users and moderator labor, but would definitely make a much better experience for fine-grained preferences

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'd also like to have the "hey we're actually hiding some content due to regulatory requirements but you can disable that filter here and here" notice prominently delivered to users - but then again that's up to individual clients unfortunately...