this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2025
368 points (98.2% liked)

memes

18070 readers
2477 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not with a receipt that detailed presumably tracked by transaction number in the computer system which also is tied to an inventory system.

Unless of course you’d worked that into the software too.

Anyways. Yes.

But also no.

Maybe.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The laundering would come from making extra profit per bs sold because its charged as a full burger but only takes a cheese slice out of your inventory/stock cost. You'd lose some of it to franchise overhead and a corporate analyst would probably catch it at a chain when they get greedier but you could do small scale laundering for a while if you didn't get greedy.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

but the system would account for the lack of inventory loss, so it would become increasingly hard to justify this.

If it was a mom and pop, easy.

McDonald’s, yeah for a little while but I bet they’d catch you stealing from them before someone caught you laundering money.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

but the system would account for the lack of inventory loss, so it would become increasingly hard to justify this.

Who would catch this, though?

The question asked is whether a franchise owner could use fake orders to use dirty money and boost clean profits. What does the inventory have to do with anything? The franchise owner doesn't care, because they're the ones doing the money laundering. And McDonald's corporate doesn't care because they still get paid.

It doesn't seem like a particularly efficient method of money laundering, but I am curious to know if this could feasibly be a pipeline for cleaning money in small quantities.