this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
22 points (89.3% liked)
PC Gaming
12732 readers
727 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Just about any game with full-screen motion will be noticeably better at 120+ fps than 60. How much better will depend on the game, screen size, and viewing distance.
Bear in mind that higher frame rates will mean your GPU has to do more work, so it will use more power and produce more heat. (They might even induce coil whine.) I therefore set a frame rate limit in graphics-intensive games, to enjoy smoother motion without driving my electricity bill deep into the land of diminishing returns. The sweet spot for me is usually somewhere in the 60-120 range, but I find that even 40 fps is enough for certain games, like Baldur's Gate 3.
If you're shopping for a monitor, I suggest looking for variable refresh rate support. It makes frame rate dips and peaks less jarring, and offers more flexibility in setting frame rate limits.