this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
121 points (99.2% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3484 readers
204 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes/pics of text

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reagan-appointed federal judge Mark Wolf has resigned from the bench in Massachusetts, and his explanation is blunt: he can no longer bear the ethical constraints that prevent judges from speaking out publicly while Trump dismantles the rule of law.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

...instead of, you know, staying on and using your bench to defend the constitution from Trump. Nice backbone you got there.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

if you actually read the article he's becoming an activist against Trump. Something he is not allowed to do while holding the position

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He would make more of an impact staying where he was.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

While I believe everyone should do what they feel is best, I have to agree with you

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

no the article specifically shows it would not:

When I became a senior judge in 2013, my successor was appointed, so my resignation will not create a vacancy to be filled by the president.

More importantly, Wolf’s making clear this resignation isn’t symbolic retreat—it’s tactical:

I resigned in order to speak out, support litigation, and work with other individuals and organizations dedicated to protecting the rule of law and American democracy. I also intend to advocate for the judges who cannot speak publicly for themselves.
[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Nobody reads the article, dork!

Thanks for your diligence… apparently folks don’t even read the comments anymore either lol

In this case as the top of thread commenter, I stand corrected and glad I read down here if not the article itself.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

so now he holds the same power as a citizen!

what power would that be?

1000002374

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's doomerism friend. He has the power to use his knowledge of the legal system and his status as a famous judge

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

it's not doomerism, it's the truth.

who do those things influence?

not the legal system, because now he has to work within the legal system and not on-top-of the legal system.

as far as being a "famous judge" does that mean Judge Judy has more power than him since she's more famous?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

boy just pasting this on all the arm chair no it alls who can't be bothered to read the article:

When I became a senior judge in 2013, my successor was appointed, so my resignation will not create a vacancy to be filled by the president.

More importantly, Wolf’s making clear this resignation isn’t symbolic retreat—it’s tactical:

I resigned in order to speak out, support litigation, and work with other individuals and organizations dedicated to protecting the rule of law and American democracy. I also intend to advocate for the judges who cannot speak publicly for themselves.
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

who has more power in the justice department; a lawyer or a judge?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

did you read it. trump does not pick his successor. It was picked in 2013 and he knows who it is. This is cake and eat it to.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

wrong!

the judge has more power because they can set precedent.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So. He knows his replacement is good and can do that job for him and is younger and can stay at the post longer. I just don't know how to explain this. You are wrong. What he is doing is the smartest thing to do.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The point being made here is why the fuck is everyone who is in a position to do fucking anything to stop the fascists following the rules so punctiliously, when the fascists demonstrably do not give a flying fuck about the rules?

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Bc that's the point. If you stoop to their level then you are no better than them. The law means something to this man. He will fight how he chooses to to maintain that law

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

because what he is doing is more effective:

When I became a senior judge in 2013, my successor was appointed, so my resignation will not create a vacancy to be filled by the president.

More importantly, Wolf’s making clear this resignation isn’t symbolic retreat—it’s tactical:

I resigned in order to speak out, support litigation, and work with other individuals and organizations dedicated to protecting the rule of law and American democracy. I also intend to advocate for the judges who cannot speak publicly for themselves.
[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago

Trump and his goons have no problem doing things they're not allowed to do. Accepting foreign gifts, stealing the power of the purse, trampling over the bill of rights, kidnapping and selling citizens to foreign prisons like cattle. We can't beat those dickheads if we play by the rules. If whiny fascists say "you can't do that" the answer should always be "come and stop me."