this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
217 points (98.2% liked)

Tumblr

254 readers
558 users here now

Welcome to /c/Tumblr

All the chaos of Tumblr, without actually going to Tumblr.

Rule 1: Be Civil, Not CursedThis isn’t your personal call-out post.

  • No harassment, dogpiling, or brigading
  • No bigotry (transphobia, racism, sexism, etc.)
  • Keep it fun and weird, not mean-spirited

Rule 2: No Forbidden PostsSome things belong in the drafts forever. That means:

  • No spam or scams
  • No porn or sexually explicit content
  • No illegal content (don’t make this a federal case)
  • NSFW screenshots must be properly tagged

If you see a post that breaks the rules, report it so the mods can handle it. Otherwise just reblog and relax.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I actually see it the opposite: basements make the ground floor not being the same as the first floor even more confusing.

For instance, in the US you could have this building:


Second floor (2)

First floor (1)

First basement (B1)

Second basement (B2)


2 upper floors + 2 basement floors = 4 floors total (easy math).

I could see an argument that when counting whole numbers from positive to negative, we normally include "0," so then wouldn't you have a 2 floor, 1 floor, 0 floor, -1 floor, -2 floor? But that's not how counting physical objects actually works, because it then implies that the ground floor (0 floor) doesn't exist, and the basement floors are somehow anti-floors? Like they exist in the upside-down or are made of antimatter or something. So I don't think the inclusion of a "0th floor" makes sense even with basement floors.

Room naming isn't a problem either, because you're not actually counting the rooms: the existence of room 200 doesn't require the existence of room 199, after all. So having a "000" series of rooms is not only unnecessary, but could cause confusion because it looks like an error (like "room 004" was supposed to be "room 1004" but the "1" fell off). Prior to computers and the need to label files "001" so the computer would sort them correctly, we didn't label things with unnecessary leading zeros like that, because any human sorting things knows that "2" comes before "18" in a series, not the other way around. It's not like we label other similar things, such as buildings, with leading zeros: we wouldn't say someone lives at "0040 Baker St"... they live at "40 Baker St" or "400 Baker St" or "4000 Baker St" or shudder "40000 Baker St." (There actually is a city in the US--Portland Oregon--where because of geography they used to label a small number of addresses as "Southwest 0XXX Whatever Ave," but the leading zero caused so much confusion that the city designated a whole new category of "South" for a relatively small sliver of land just to resolve the problem... They had already done so to distinguish "North Portland" from "Northeast Portland," but again due to geography that was a substantial amount of land so it made sense for this "fifth quadrant" as it was called to exist. If this all sounds nonsensical it's because it's really hard to explain quickly and without a map.).

I normally wouldn't care so much about this topic but I found the ground floor/first floor thing really confusing and frustrating when I traveled abroad, so now I have opinions! Also I'm sick today and this has been a great distraction from how icky I feel.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Etymology is the why, really. For example the german word for floor (in this context), Stockwerk, comes from "putting something on top". So it would make no sense at all to call the ground floor the 1. Stockwerk. It is usually labelled E for Erdgeschoss (=ground floor) though and not 0.

Or to be even more precise when talking about buildings there are the abbreviations:

  • 2. OG
  • 1. OG
  • EG
  • 1. UG
  • 2. UG
[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Well now we're just back at the "entree" problem:

If we're centuries separated from the original meaning, does it even matter?