Linux
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
view the rest of the comments
TIL they even kept it around that long.
There is no 32 bit hardware capable of running a recent FF version, let alone browse the www with it.
Some Pentium 3 and 4 machines are absolutely capable of running a recent version of FF
Mozilla lists the minimum requirements for Firefox 144 as "1 gigahertz (GHz) or faster compatible processor or System on a Chip (SoC)" and 1 GB of RAM.
As for Pentium 4, you need to qualify that, because Pentium 4 wasn't exclusively 32-bit – only the earlier ones were. Cedar Mill and many Prescotts supported Intel 64. So we'll assume a generous case that someone is using something like a Pentium 4 505, where "capable of running" probably still isn't the same as "running decently on any modern website".
So you're left with Linux or BSD. Firefox's Linux requirements are fairly lax, so we can assume you're not running into compat issues. That leaves you with someone who:
That's such an obscenely negligible percentage of people (and will keep falling off a cliff as that hardware dies out and fewer applications support it) that, combined with the terrible UX of a modern web browser on that hardware, the baggage that comes with not assuming 64-bit can't be justified.
@TheTechnician27 @kittenzrulz123 The idea that you can run Firefox on a system with 1GB of RAM is laughable. I had to upgrade my system to 16GB because running Firefox in fewer became too painful.
What do you do in browser?
At work I would be extremely fine with 8GB, and we use Windows browser apps. Even they would run fine with 4GB of RAM.
So why 16?
1000 tabs obvs
I can barely do anything else on my personal machine with 8GB if I have firefox open. And it swaps.
Now I'm missing my pentium 3 1Ghz with 128mb of ram because of this thread.
@devfuuu @msage This is my experience exactly. I don't care much for this thread, the fact is Firefox won't run in 1MB and in my experience won't run very well in 8MB. If other peoples' mileages magically vary, good for them.
Do you use Windows?
No. Not in almost 20 years.
Then what do you do that requires more than 8GB RAM?
Aren't the Raspberries and SBCs 32b?
I know some have 64b capabilities, but not all, and I thought they are using FF for signage...?
Looks like the Pi 1, 2, and Zero are 32-bit (and probably other old or low spec SBCs). I'm also not sure if Firefox is distinguishing between 32-bit ARM and 32-bit x86.
I should've added this as a possible caveat.
I have a computer with two Pentium 3 processors (2x1.4GHz) and 4gigs of RAM that would be technically capable of running it, albeit a bit slowly.
It's like the holy grail of retro computing and not that common - but that's not the point! :D