this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
6 points (80.0% liked)

Home

800 readers
1 users here now

Lemmy.zip instance discussion.

For all things relating to Lemmy.zip.

Main instance rules apply, with the additional rules below:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi, I've noticed that bot@lemmit.online has been banned.
Since that account posts all of the content on that instance, this is essentially equivalent to defederating from lemmit.online.
I realize that not everybody likes lemmit.online since it is all just reposts from Reddit, but it seems like it would be preferable to just put it on the default block list instead of banning the content entirely for all users. I personally like being able to read content from Reddit here without having to give Reddit my traffic.
Would it be possible to unban?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Serious comment: why would the bot get banned instead of people just using the user/instance filter if they didn't like it? This seems like blowing up a burger king because a friend said they'd rather not eat there.

[–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Because the admin has to host all that content, which I imagine contains 0.01% interesting stuff for less than 1% of the users.

Last time I ran a Lemmy instance I used like 300GB in a few weeks and that was just by firehosing ALL Lemmy posts. Storage gets bloated fast unless the admin actively implements hacks, like not caching media content. But that kind of defeats the purpose of federation IMO.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's quitter talk.

Seriously though, thanks for the insight. I still like having the content, but your points make total sense.

[–] StellarExtract@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course, it's also possible it was just a mistake, which is partly why I made the post. The reason listed for the ban was "post spam," which could be considered an accurate characterization given the volume, but might also be a misinterpretation of the content.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

Also a good point. Wonder if we will ever know the answer lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)