this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
79 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

18667 readers
536 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zabadoh@ani.social 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe the CCP can invest in harvesting ocean garbage, or importing all those single-use sachets they've been selling to the neighboring countries?

Incineration doesn't help the greenhouse gas problem though... It just takes garbage and puts it in the atmosphere. Not what the world really needs right now.

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The greenhouse emissions problem depends on where that garbage would otherwise end up, and what would happen with it.

If the garbage would otherwise be recycled fully then incineration would seem like a worse option. But if the garbage would otherwise end up in a landfill, it leads to decomposition and methane production. Methane is one of the worst greenhouse gasses out there, so incineration might be preferable to just leaving it be.

I'm no expert whatsoever, so take my comment with a grain of salt.. I may be misinformed