PhilosophyMemes

318 readers

1 users here now

Memes must be related to phil.

The Memiverse:
!90s_memes@quokk.au
!y2k_memes@quokk.au
!sigh_fi@quokk.au

founded 3 months ago

MODERATORS

Deceptichum@quokk.au

166

this seems relative (quokk.au)

submitted 2 weeks ago by Deceptichum@quokk.au to c/philosophymemes@quokk.au

87 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well with objective universalism, killing is good, as unlife is the most common state of existence, it can never be immoral to unalive something.

If the universe has intent, it clearly is moving all things towards low entropy unlife, and as such unaliving is to carry out a moral good, and always moral, no?

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I know you're taking a piss, but why would forcing all things to be the same be necessarily moral?

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When arguing for a universal intent, it's typically argued as virtuous/moral to further that intent, or at least immoral to go against that intent.

The conclusions are bunk because the premise is bunk.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Ah. I suppose that makes some sense but yeah the whole premise of universal intent is just silly.