this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
601 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

77072 readers
3363 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 54 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

From what I have read, he's still likely to be able to line up enough votes to get his $1 trillion pay package (and the associated voting rights), despite a lot of major institutional investors being in opposition. But we'll see when the vote goes though.

I think that Tesla can probably get a more-effective CEO for less money, personally. Even if he leaves as CEO, he still owns 15% of Tesla and is fabulously wealthy as a result. I don't feel like he's getting a bad deal.

I do think that there are some arguments that the SEC should pass some regulation to help ensure board-CEO independence; part of the issue is that the board, which is supposed to oversee Musk, has been considered to be acting on his behalf by quite a few people. I don't think that it will happen under the present administration, though.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He wants the bragging rights. It's just a game at these numbers

1 Trillion % this.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Slime mould would be a better CEO.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Slime mould is pretty cool in general!

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Effective yes, but uh what's the wording image-that-props-up-crazy-valuation no.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think that Tesla can probably get a more-effective CEO for less money, personally.

Musk takes $0 pay as CEO other than these post-performance-goal-hit pay packets though. Good luck finding another CEO who will work for free for 5+ years.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll happily do it for $1 million a year and do a hell of a lot better than musk. Considering the difference between $1 trillion and $1 million is pretty much $1 trillion I'm basically working for free.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 2 weeks ago

He’s not getting paid a trillion a year - he’s getting paid $0. They pay you $1mil a year and go nowhere good. They pay him nothing and if they hit goals people say are impossible he gets a trillion.