this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
53 points (98.2% liked)

Australia

4610 readers
181 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Seagoon_@aussie.zone 21 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

nimbies, real estate agents and land lords are running the show

everyone else, like 95% of the population, embraces house affordability

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Yes and no. There are a lot of owner-occupiers in Australia now who on paper are Millionaires, and they like being Millionaires. They are not going to like it if/when that status is stripped from them.

If houses nationally suddenly dropped in value by 50%, even if people's mortgages were halved at the same time, I expect the change would still be met with hostility. It's the unspoken truth of housing affordability: far too many Australians are happy with the present housing prices. They're outnumbered by the rest of us, but they are a large enough voting block to decide any election.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

They’re outnumbered by the rest of us, but they are a large enough voting block to decide any election.

If they're outnumbered, how are they deciding the election?

[–] YeahToast@aussie.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because they are often wealthy, connected and have a voice, for example negative gearing. This only impacted a small percentage of people compared to the masses, but still made labor lose in a landslide to the liberal party in 2019

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 2 weeks ago

So they're not outnumbered then, are they?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)