this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
127 points (90.4% liked)

politics

31119 readers
1763 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Let's be honest here. How many people would have recognized that image as a Nazi symbol before thos became news? I wouldn't have, skull tatoos are common. News articles had to tell is it was and show pictures of and explain what it had been some 80 years ago. Maybe he knew it was a Nazi symbol, but I kinda doubt it given his political statements and the fact that any smart person running for office in Maine wouldn't have got it removed long before.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

How many people would have recognized that image as a Nazi symbol before thos became news? I wouldn’t have, skull tatoos are common.

That just makes a stronger case against him. It is what it is--a nazi symbol used by the nazis. Not being familiar with it just means you're an average person who hasn't learned about all their symbols beyond the infamous swastika. The main people who are most likely to recognize it are either people who are into WWII history or people who are into nazi shit. Among those two groups of people, someone who would actually tattoo it over their heart are in the latter, not the former group, certainly not the average person. He has (finally) admitted he knew what it was.

[–] Scirocco@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Bullshit. A group of drunk Marines in a tattoo shop on shore leave is EXACTLY the sort of idiots that would point a a fat-looking pirate skull-crossbones on a sketchy tattoo shop wall and all get tattooed together.

This and eating the red crayons are a core activity for ignorant young devil-dogs.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

I know quite a bit about WW2 history, and even I wouldn't immediately recognise it as the SS skull. It's not a Swastika, it's not the SS symbol, it's not even an iron cross.

The fact that he didn't remove it when he prepared to run, but only removed in, and did so immediately, after it was pointed out, shows that he didn't know. And he immediately distanced himself once he did know. I don't know what more you can expect.

Ultimately, though, the only thing that matters are his actions. The fact that he stands up to fascists, calls out bigotry and stands up for marginalized groups, tells you much more about him than any tattoo ever will.

[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Even if it wasn't a nazi tatoo; According to his words "He got a tattoo of a skull to memorialize his slaughtering of people in Ramadii and Falujah". Then hiis comments which dated as late as 2021 where he said about his war that "we would kill them all because our ways of life is superior."

BadEmpanda summerized it so well. What is your response to his arguments in this video?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=JZc5Mbix3VE

Enough sucking the dick of a moraless supramacist psychopathic war criminal just because he learned to lie to get votes and promised you better healthcare.

Fuck off with that reformed nonesense. Just admit you're a supramacist just like Nick Furete who says he would invade Venzula because it will benefit the US ecomony from their oil. Just like Israeli Zionist Jewish supermacists justifying maiming, blinding, and slaughtering of Palestinians because the Jews in their country gives them free lands and prevliages no one gets in any other where in the world.

Listen to the arguments in that video and see the evidence, then tell me how you are any different different.

Or admit it and say it loud you're a moraless supramacist like Nick Furete, and at least I'd have more respect for you.

[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world -5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

But that means he's not a smart person. That, along with the fact he is obviously prone to making poorly-informed decisions would give me serious pause about voting for him. Those are not the qualities of a good leader.

[–] webadict@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Smart people don't know everything. Smart people change their mind when confronted with things they are wrong about or don't know enough about.

[–] porkloin@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Then don’t vote for him when the primary rolls around if you live in the state. Elections are a mechanism for finding out if his faults are acceptable to local constituency he would represent. People are acting like he’s a set in stone candidate and this is some moral crisis for the party.

The primary is in June of 2026. The “democratic establishment” and every opinion column ragebait columnist should just cool it. Let the voters decide in 8 months if they buy his apology and whatever else he does between now and then.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can I just say how insane it is that the primary campaign starts this far in advance? There are countries that run an entire election with all its phases, campaigns and preparations in this time.

[–] KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago

This is probably why USA politics is so swayed by large donations. Only big money can afford buying TV ads over a year.