this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
7 points (76.9% liked)

Videos

17271 readers
71 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed
  9. AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Flutter@lemmy.world
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
can@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@sh.itjust.works
7
Radiation and Cancer: Linear No-Threshold revisited (www.youtube.com)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by No1@aussie.zone to c/videos@lemmy.world
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"What the public doesn’t know is that the fundamental assumption of radiation safety and regulation simply isn’t true. This is the case against Linear No-Threshold."

I found this video getting more interesting the further it went on. No relationship between cancer and radiation? And cancer rates go down for those with radiation exposure? You may be radiation deficient?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bitofarambler@crazypeople.online 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Whoa!

Thank you for sharing, I'm living at 11,200 ft right now, very likely receiving higher doses of radiation coincidentally, and this video and especially it's included data that I had no knowledge of whatsoever previously, has literally changed how I see every part of the world that has to do with radiation.

Fascinating, reassuring, fascinating.

I asked everyone I knew in the medical field about Fukushima after it happened, literal doctors, about why there were no radioactive casualties and I got so many answers that didn't fit.

And here's the answer, LNT.

Crazy.