Not The Onion

18671 readers

262 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

-37

In defense of the White House ballroom (www.washingtonpost.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by MHLoppy@fedia.io to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Donald Trump vs. the NIMBYs

The teardown of the White House’s East Wing this week is a Rorschach test. Many see the rubble as a metaphor for President Donald Trump’s reckless disregard of norms and the rule of law, a reflection of his willingness to bulldoze history and a temple to a second Gilded Age, paid for by corporate donors. Others see what they love about Trump: A lifelong builder boldly pursuing a grand vision, a change agent unafraid to decisively take on the status quo and a developer slashing through red tape that would stymie any normal politician.

In classic Trump fashion, the president is pursuing a reasonable idea in the most jarring manner possible. Privately, many alumni of the Biden and Obama White Houses acknowledge the long-overdue need for an event space like what Trump is creating. It is absurd that tents need to be erected on the South Lawn for state dinners, and VIPs are forced to use porta-potties.

The State Dining Room seats 140. The East Room seats about 200. Trump says the ballroom at the center of his 90,000-square-foot addition will accommodate 999 guests. The next Democratic president will be happy to have this.

Preservationists express horror that Trump did not submit his plans to their scrutiny, but the truth is that this project would not have gotten done, certainly not during his term, if the president had gone through the traditional review process. The blueprints would have faced death by a thousand papercuts. [...]

Archived: archive.today

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] despite_velasquez@lemmy.world -3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

If there was a suitable banquet hall, why are state receptions held on the South Lawn by every admin?

Not passing judgement, making an observation

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

For starters, there's the ballroom of the Washington Hilton, located less than 2 miles from the White House, where the White House Correspondents' Dinner is held every year and has a seating capacity of more than twice what this one is planned to have.

It's really not like DC is hurting for hotels, ballrooms, convention centers and other suitable places to host large events.

As for why have it on the south lawn when those sorts of facilities are available? I ask myself a similar question whenever I get a wedding invite and the venue is outdoors, but people choose and even prefer to have these sorts of formal events outside sometimes, so this is cutting into available space to host those sorts of events, because it's a lot harder to find a large private outdoor space in DC that can be easily secured than it is to find a suitable indoor space.

[–] al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes as if that is the only thing the US government did that made people's lives more difficult and didn't make sense...