this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
254 points (98.1% liked)

Fuck Cars

16603 readers
637 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They don’t understand probability

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What's with the random comparisons? Sometimes it's the whole US, sometimes specific parts. What does 500 rides mean? Annual deaths per 100'000 population per 500 rides?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

The per 100,000 is pretty standard for per capita

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but I don't understand how it would combine with the 500 rides. Were they counting only people who rode 500 times a year? Or is the implication that for this line they didn't go by 100000 people, but instead by 500 rides? That would make it incomparable. I just don't get it

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

Oh I had to go back to see what you were referring to with the 500 rides thing... Maybe that's the sample size for NYC?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Although saying per capita here would be misleading, because it's not like those people ride the subway 500 times AND drives a car everywhere. The ones who take the subway are the only ones at risk of subway homocide, the ones who drive are actually less likely to die in a traffic accident than people outside of their car like pedestrians and bikers, and the two groups probably are much different in size.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes 500 is about the average number of rides that an NYC subway commuter takes per year. Since all the other stats are also per year.