this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
53 points (96.5% liked)

California

1952 readers
67 users here now

Welcome to /c/California, an online haven that brings to life the unrivaled diversity and vibrancy of California! This engaging community offers a virtual exploration of the Golden State, taking you from the stunning Pacific coastline to the rugged Sierra Nevada, and every town, city, and landmark in between. Discover California's world-class wineries, stunning national parks, innovative tech scene, robust agricultural heartland, and culturally diverse metropolises.

Discussions span a wide range of topics—from travel tips and restaurant recommendations to local politics and environmental issues. Whether you're a lifelong resident, a recent transplant, or planning your dream visit, /c/California is your one-stop place to share experiences, ask questions, and celebrate all the things that make California truly unique.

Related Communities:

Nearby Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TLDR: Cities are allowing developers to re-zone retail units that go un-leased. They can then be converted into live-work studios so people can run businesses from home ie. an artist running a home studio, a massage therapist taking clients, a home daycare, etc. Seems this could really help with California’s chronic housing crisis.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I live in a building that's been sold three times so far. You are aware people sell real estate sometimes?

Obviously, but they are likely taking that money to invest in more profitable real-estate elsewhere. The ultimate goal here is to reduce the consolidation on the ownership of real-estate, meaning these investors will ultimately lose value. Morally, they could and should abdicate, but since when has that motivated the wealthy?

The mechanisms do exist for your suggestion, and some owners would actually be okay with it, but I would still expect a lot of opposition.

Look into the history of eminent domain too see (historically) just how receptive land owners have been to selling their land to the government.

All this is basically just to illustrate my original point:

Complex economies rarely have "super simple solutions" without pitfalls

I don't think that's a reason for inaction, but it does explain why real change is so hard to actually implement at scale.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Look into the history of eminent domain too see (historically) just how receptive land owners have been to selling their land to the government.

I've been on a jury for an eminent domain case, I am familiar. Usually that's when the government needs a specific piece of property instead of just wants to buy some kind of property in general.

England has done this, and it's worked. I'm done speaking with you about this. Have a good weekend.