this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
86 points (97.8% liked)

Bicycling

2999 readers
61 users here now

A community for those who enjoy bicycling for any reason— utility, recreation, sport, or whatever!

Post your questions, experiences, knowledge, pictures, news, links, and (civil) rants.

Rules (to be added on an as-needed basis)

  1. Comments and posts should be respectful and productive.
  2. No ads or commercial spam, including linking to your own monetized content.
  3. Linked content should be as unburdened by ads and trackers as possible.

Welcome!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 18 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (3 children)

I went into the article not having any clue that “saddle pain” is a euphemism.

Progressing from 200 to 400 and finally 600 kilometres, Williams started to experience what she described as "abrasion" of her labia.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 16 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Ohno

My nips have been rubbed raw on long runs, I couldn’t imagine my lips 🫠

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Pro cyclists use padded chamois, and creme embrocations. Tour de France is 2200 miles and no one needed different saddles.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

padded chamois
creme embrocations
saddles

Are these also euphemisms?

[–] tuff_wizard@aussie.zone 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Do women wear underpants when riding? I know guys don't but were less vulnerable to that kind of...abrasion. Surely a pair of low friction underwear would combat that...abrasion.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Guys don't wear underwear when cycling? Why?

[–] limelight79@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Cycling shorts have padding in them already; adding underwear is counterproductive.

[–] blackbeards_bounty@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Underwear is not for padding. I suspected my insistence on wearing both wasn't a "real" cyclists' choice, but this comment is first confirmation I've seen of that.

Your shorts must be nasty.

[–] horse@feddit.org 11 points 4 weeks ago

The reason for not wearing underwear is that it can cause chafing or pressure points where it shifts or creases. Cycling shorts are designed to minimise that by not doing either. There is nothing nasty about cycling shorts if you wash them after each ride. If anything they handle sweat better than cotton underwear would.

That being said, if you feel better wearing underwear, then you should feel free to do so. But there are practical reasons why most people don't and they don't have anything to do with trying to be a "real cyclist".

[–] SirActionSack@aussie.zone 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Most people wash their stuff when it gets sweaty but if just changing underwear is working for you and the people who are exposed to you then keep on keeping on I suppose.

[–] blackbeards_bounty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I guess I figure I wash bicycle shorts not every time, to reduce wear and tear. Underwear costs way less to replace.

[–] limelight79@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

And you assumed everyone else does the same?!

I think you owe me an apology.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 weeks ago

and your underwear isn't?

[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 4 points 4 weeks ago

I don't get it either. I have a good saddle and just wear boxers and cotton shorts. No problems all day long, when I get the chance for weeks at a time.

[–] tuff_wizard@aussie.zone 3 points 4 weeks ago

I usually wear brief style under where and the legs always roll up your leg when you pull up the riding shorts. If you just wore tighty whities it might not happen