politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
What Trump is doing makes a lot of sense. It's just standard iconoclasm.
Authoritarian regimes routinely destroy historical monuments to erase a past they oppose, promote their own ideology, and control national identity.
I think this issue is somewhat more complicated than what is described by iconoclasm. Trump and the conservative wing of American politics are simultaneously destroying certain aspects of what is usually referred to as American civil religion while still upholding massive amounts of it at the same time. For example its not like they have changed the flag, or that they dont talk about the founding fathers as some godlike figures, etc.
Iconoclasm would imply that the Trumpian cult religion is fully attempting to supplant the longstanding civil religion, but that isnt quite the case. They dont want to stop revering the founding fathers and say we should only revere trump, or say we should get rid of the American flag and replace it with the MAGA flag. The trump cult wouldnt exist without the most rabid adherents to tenets of American civil religion; belief that they are the one true patriots, etc. Progressives and the left wing in general tend to be less attached to such ideas. For example, theyre generally more willing to view the founding fathers as fallible humans rather than as figures above any form of criticism.
Rather than something that meets the definition of iconoclasm, this seems (to me, at least) to show how the MAGA cult is a form of cancerous outgrowth from American civil religion. It stemmed from ACR, and now has become so cancerous that it has started cannibalizing the very thing that spawned it in the first place. But all the while the cult members will go on believing that they are still perfect adherents to the civil religion that inspired them to destroy icons of that civil religion. Its hard to call it basic iconoclasm if one thing is not attempting to outright supersede something else, like in the traditional political example of a new ruler eliminating statues of their predecessor