this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
373 points (97.2% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
8384 readers
324 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Biologically, men are disposable. Just by the mechanics of reproduction, a large loss of women is much more devastating to population stability than a large loss of men. I can spell it out, but it should be obvious.
No they are not. Raising a child is more work than inseminating a woman. A child requires years of resources to grow and thrive.
Your world view is not just bleak, but also wrong. Humans aren't born as fully fledged beings. The gender ratio is not an accident of nature.
So? What does that have to do with anything?