this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
127 points (98.5% liked)

Linux

10196 readers
492 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev
127
Linux Package Managers Compared: APT, DNF, Pacman and Zypper (linuxblog.io)
submitted 1 month ago by cm0002@lemmy.zip to c/linux@programming.dev
59 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

If you’ve hopped between Linux distributions as much as I have, you know that each major family of distros introduces you to a different package manager. At first, it can feel a bit daunting (apt on Debian/Ubuntu, dnf on RHEL/Fedora, pacman on Arch, and zypper on openSUSE), but these tools all serve the same purpose of installing and updating software.

After using Linux for years (across everything from Debian to Arch-based systems), I’ve grown comfortable with all of them. Even niche distros like Slackware, Gentoo, and Void. In this post, I’ll break down the major package managers, how they differ, and what it’s like to use each one. We’ll also touch on the universal package formats (Snap and Flatpak) that aim to work across distributions, and lastly mention a few niche package management systems. Let’s dive in!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I guess linux really is going more mainstream, if that's the more common user experience.

They didn't say that. They said most users don't have to. That says literally nothing about how many people do or do not use a GUI versus the command line. All that means is every modern distro has a GUI built in.

It's like you didn't even read their previous comments.