this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
67 points (83.2% liked)
Vegan
1421 readers
5 users here now
A place for solarpunks working toward a world without speciesism
Rules
- This is not a place to debate veganism
- There is no place for (carnist) trolls
- No unsolicited promotion of commercial products
- No speciesism
- No promotion of violence in any way
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think the consequences are less severe socially and personally, but yeah I'd say it's just as cruel. Do you think it's more okay to hit an unintelligent person because they're not as intelligent?
Edit (forgot to answer the actual question): I think ethically the answer is pretty obviously 'just don't be cruel'. But practically consequentialism is what most people opt for.
As someone who doesn't believe in objective morality, I think how far people can/will be selfish is very different for each person and a strict generalised set of rules is ridiculous to expect.
Obviously the best thing an individual can do environmentally speaking and to reduce the most harm to others is kill themselves. Just as obviously that is an insanely absurd choice. The rest is finding the optimal point where you're reducing as much harm to others without causing too much to yourself.
No I don't think intelligence differences inside of a species matters at all for cruelty.
However intelligence between different species does matter for me, at least as much as the cuteness factor which shouldn't matter but lets be honest for most people does.
There's also the threat and annoyance factor hence mosquito<fly<butterfly.
Btw thanks guys for all the replies and civil discussion have a good night everyone.