this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
125 points (96.3% liked)

Anti Meme

675 readers
51 users here now

We're the anti-meme community where the joke is that there isn't one, and by explaining that, we've ruined the whole thing, but we all find the collective misery hilarious.

The music of comedy is more important than the joke itself.

Follow the instance rules please, this is a lovely instance.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Solely_a_Catt@programming.dev 102 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (13 children)

That one is quite simple. On the sketch, you get

w+x+y+z=360º

Making the substitution with x+y=w+z, you get

w+w+z+z=360º <=> 2(w+z)=360º <=> w+z=180º

Proving AOB is a line, because the sketch provides, that w+z is an angle of AOB.

I am pretty sure, you were not asking for the proof, but I wanted to do it anyways. Does a genuine proof count as an anti meme?

[–] ragingHungryPanda@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

how do you know that x+y=w+z? isn't that already assuming that they are equal? what if they're one degree off?

[–] f314@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As the teacher would tell you: read the entire problem before answering! (It says so in the problem)

[–] ragingHungryPanda@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

dammit nothing changes 😂

[–] Sas@beehaw.org 11 points 1 month ago

Because we read the question: if x+y=w+z, prove...

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago

isn't that already assuming that they are equal?

The problem asks us to make this assumption.

load more comments (9 replies)