this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
820 points (97.0% liked)

Political Memes

9854 readers
1993 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I still don't really get why the spending has to increase if Russia's military is so desolate. Why is there discussioneof mandatory military service in Germany if it's simply to "defend" against an enemy that is too weak to actually be a threat?

that only it has happened because the Russian military command were too scared of Putin to actually tell him the truth.

Sorry, that is just motivated reasoning to frame Putin as an unstrategic maniac.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Russians have shown great ability and resolve to switch to a wartime economy and ramp up military industrial production while Europe has struggled for years just to increase their artillery shell production. The belief is that if the war in Ukraine ends, it won't take Russia long to replace their loses.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That doesn't explain why Russia should have any strategic interest in invading Europe, though.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They didnt have a strategic case for Ukraine either. Its the personal whim of Putin.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

That's just bullshit. Russian's military (it's not just Putin - he's an authoritarian, but he's not a supreme leader - he has to watch his step very carefully or the next authoritarian will take his place) definetly did have a strategic interest in the black sea. That's why all that annexation of crimea business started (afaik).

So it's the Russian government that's enforcing the nation state's interest here, definetly not due to the "personal whim" of someone.

Putin can't afford to be a mad king. He definetly isn't the only one in the Kremlin who can just disappear people...

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where do you get the impression that Russia isn’t a threat? Ukraine proves that it very much is.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 month ago

Where do you get the impression that Russia isn’t a threat?

Having a military that's in such a supposed desolate state is mutually exclusive to being a threat. That's like claiming a teenager with a slingshot is a threat to a gang of polige officers with assault rifles.

Ukraine proves that it very much is.

I don't follow. The invasion of Ukraine had a strategic motivation behind it (so did the annexation of Crimea). What possible strategic benefit would it have for Russia to attack the EU?

That's like claiming that the US is about to invade Mexico, because of the Iraq war(s).