this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
81 points (100.0% liked)

Linux Phones

3196 readers
124 users here now

The Discussion on Linux-based Phones.


Benefits:

  • Hardware freedom.
  • Perfect operating-system competition.
  • Full utilization of specs.
  • Phone lifespan raises to 10+ years.
  • Less e-waste.

Linux Mobile Distros:

  • Ubuntu Touch
  • Sailfish
  • FuriOS
  • Postmarket OS
  • Mobian
  • Pure OS
  • Plasma Mobile
  • LuneOS
  • openSUSE Mobile
  • Nemomobile
  • Droidian
  • Mobile NixOS
  • ExpidusOS
  • Maemo Leste
  • Manjaro Arm
  • Tizen
  • WebOS

Linux Mobile Hardware:

  • Fairphone 5
  • Volla Phone
  • PinePhone
  • FLX1
  • Librem 5

⚙️Contribute

🧼Go Clean From the Duopoly:

💻Related Communities:

📰News:

💬Messager:

⌚️Watch:


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Update: CMA moving in right direction? https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/oct/22/apple-google-face-enforced-changes-uk-mobile-phone-dominance-uk-competition-watchdog-stricter-oversight

Dan is a UK based full stack web developer who is working on Bookstack, a self-hostable wiki platform (MIT license).

On Google's recent announcement about developer verification he writes:

This is a massive leap in control, further centralising approval power to Google across the entire Android ecosystem while cementing themselves as the ultimate gatekeeper of what users can run on their own devices, all under the guise of security. This is a further step away from an open ecosystem, while being harmful to any platform competition & innovation.

...as a UK resident I feel my best bet to counter this is via the Competition & Markets Authority (CMA).

He includes his report as a basis for others to use perhaps.

Dan is a UK based full stack web developer who is working on Bookstack, a self-hostable wiki platform (MIT license).

On Google's recent announcement about developer verification he writes:

This is a massive leap in control, further centralising approval power to Google across the entire Android ecosystem while cementing themselves as the ultimate gatekeeper of what users can run on their own devices, all under the guise of security. This is a further step away from an open ecosystem, while being harmful to any platform competition & innovation.

...as a UK resident I feel my best bet to counter this is via the Competition & Markets Authority (CMA).

He includes his report as a basis for others to use perhaps.

Dan is a UK based full stack web developer who is working on Bookstack, a self-hostable wiki platform (MIT license).

On Google's recent announcement about developer verification he writes:

This is a massive leap in control, further centralising approval power to Google across the entire Android ecosystem while cementing themselves as the ultimate gatekeeper of what users can run on their own devices, all under the guise of security. This is a further step away from an open ecosystem, while being harmful to any platform competition & innovation.

...as a UK resident I feel my best bet to counter this is via the Competition & Markets Authority (CMA).

He includes his report as a basis for others to use perhaps.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago

As far as I know it offers paid premium features and it has closed source components.

That's a no from me.