Hi y'all!
I've been using Nvidia GPUs for about all my life, but have been hearing how AMD usually plays nicer with Linux.
I'm somewhat new to this OS and all the distros, and I was wondering if you could help me with understanding some of the differences.
I currently have a 4080 from Nvidia, and I use it for both content creation and gaming. Back when I was picking out my new GPU, I wanted to pick the 7900 XTX from AMD, but I was on windows back then and the two GPUs were the exact same price in my region, so I figured I might as well pick that.
Fast forward to today and I am noticing that the 4080 is struggling a bit with games like Clair Obscur: Expedition 33.
(I'm getting forty fps on medium/high settings with 1440p) and I see some people suggest it is because of the translation overhead of Nvidia via Proton, and that this would be reduced with AMDs GPUs, but I'm not entirely sure how much there is to gain here, really.
So.. TL:DR;
What is gained and what is lost if I were to sell the 4080 and switch to AMDs 7900XTX or 9070XT?
I'm on ~~arch~~ Nobara, btw
Depending on the game, this is very possible. Playing Remnant II with a friend of mine, an Unreal 5 game, and without DLSS upscaling and frame-gen, it doesn't run very well. Feels like Unreal 5 games in general have a tendency to run like arse without fake frames and fake resolution.
I'm on an RTX4070 Super. It works alright for me, but the 580 drivers are causing a lot of weirdness. Proton 10 stopped working altogether, and plenty of games just run weird with them. Sticking to 570 for now. Coupling with the weird issues some people have in VR with select headsets and nvidia I'd probably swap to AMD myself, just to avoid all the hassle that nvidia comes with.
Edit: I think someone mentioned Intel. I ran an Arc A770 for a while. Linux drivers are alright, but Intel honestly focuses more on machine learning than gaming. Gaming support was okay-ish, with middling performance. I was interested in giving VR a go however, and Intel doesn't support that at all.