politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
This, ladies and gentlemen, is the answer from the fucking White House communication director when he was asked to comment.
When I hear this kinda response, it just makes me find the claims more believable.
Like whenever this admin comes out with this kind of rhetoric, it usually means the accusation is true.
Yeah this is definitely something a guilty person wants their press team to say.
I always skip over Cheung's quotes and I advise you to do the same. He's been performing his shtick for years and has never once added value to anything.
Tou spelled "Medvedev" wrong
I sure hope the Democratic Party starts calling out Murc's Law if they ever get any power back. The Republican Party can do this stuff all the time, but the Tone Police come out to start wagging their fingers at anyone to the left of Goebbels over breaking decorum or some "civility" norms. And while these Tone Police are quite often outright Republicans, the Democrats will go along with them, often joining in.
Sadly, it goes all the way down to the trenches, too. You'll agree with some leftists on 98% of policy, and they'll want to endlessly lecture if they found you used a word or phrase or argument that offends them. This happens mostly online in certain corners of the 'net, but it also happens IRL. I got lectured about having a focus on issues of class is not "intersectional" enough, and by implication, makes me a racist. This kind of thing is exactly how the elites want things to go, by the way. Pointing this out meant I have not ~~done enough struggle sessions~~, excuse me, have not read enough queer/feminist/whatever lit and I need to "check my privilege". None of this hairsplitting and maximalist identity politics is doing any good. It will never lead to the equivalent of an FDR making sweeping changes to help society overall.
I guess my point is I wish liberals would start embracing frank speech, at all levels, and stop worrying about offending people, most especially offending Republicans, "independents" and "centrists".
Exactly. There's no way large scale change can happen in society as long as those who want that change are arguing about the details and are too busy trying no to offend their allies.
Leaders have known for centuries that sowing division is the best way to keep power to themselves.
But, for much of the source material behind his books, he has tapes. People say things and he quotes them. But those tapes are probably priceless and should be super-backed-up.