this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
308 points (98.1% liked)

World News

50896 readers
1640 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fulcrummed@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Good god, never could I have imagined I’d read a headline like this in my lifetime. So many news stories are deeply disturbing. There is something about the combination of terrorism via a novel and whimsical delivery method is absolutely horrifying.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 1 month ago (3 children)

This was a military operation.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Still a terrorist attack, if you ask me. The terrorists just happen to be state sponsored.

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're correct, but states usually have a monopoly on violence, and state sanctioned terrorism is rarely called such. If you're using violence and fear to achieve a political goal, that's terrorism. Every state employs it to some extent. (Usually not this obviously though.)

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm of the view that there'd be more productive discussions if we collectively started to use the word "terrorism" in a more nuanced way that allowed for the possibility that not all terrorism is necessarily morally bad.

What got me started thinking this was that there is a character in Star Trek: Deep Space 9 who is open about the fact that she used to be a terrorist — except this was in the context of resisting a brutal occupation of her planet. I have recently been rewatching the show, and it's interesting to see how the narrative frames this as an overall morally good thing whilst also reckoning with the aspects of the resistance that were morally bad. Makes me wistful for that kind of nuance in real world discussions of violent resistance.

It might also make it easier to vehemently condemn senseless acts of state sanctioned terrorism such as this bombing. Though based on the long history of interactional inaction towards multiple genocides, that probably wouldn't make much difference.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Yep, I agree. The state gets to call anything they want terrorism (even when it isn't) and nothing they do is called terrorism. It's just a cudgel they can use to suppress dissent. We need to point out when they do terrorism, and also point to where terrorism has been used to do good, so they lose this tool that let's them do anything they want.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Fair enough IMO

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Like they said, terrorism.