this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
868 points (97.3% liked)

People Twitter

9188 readers
398 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 122 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

How insurance should work: Disasters are unpredictable, are bound to happen and can be very expensive to resolve. So instead of each individual risking bankruptcy for participating in a system, everybody pools together money at a much lower individual cost. That money goes toward a statistical guarantee that the cost of any disaster will be covered.

How insurance actually works (under capitalism): For-profit companies use every tool at their disposal, regardless of ethics or legality, in order to take as much of your money as they can possibly get away with while simultaneously paying out as little as they can possibly get away with, and then pocket the difference.

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why people think first part is great for insurance, but when somebody wants to scale that up its suddenly horrible socialism.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The province I'm in has socialized car insurance through a crown corporation. We all pay relatively the same rate, and there are discount tiers applied based on years of experience. If they have a good year of low payouts we get rebate cheques because its not a profit corp.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's the way you do it, if it must be done at all. And despite my antipathy towards cars, it seems it must.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I would think it would disincentivize driving?

Drive less > less chance of accident > fewer payouts > bigger refund check > adjust forecast lower for next year > lower premiums > GOTO 1

Or maybe it's closer to zero sum. because some think that way while some asshole cough Alberta uses the money on extra tires and gasoline to drive even more.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

Not surprising that the refund check doesn't reduce driving in practise. If memory serves - you can't reward a behaviour into extinction, just like you can't punish a new behaviour into existence.

At least, that's if you credit what they teach in applied behaviour analysis courses. I don't get to use my degree much, except at times like this.

[–] siipale@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

Why would you pay for a car to not drive it but instead collect the refunds? It would be cheaper to not have a car. I think it would incentivize driving more as the premiums are low and when that causes premiums to rise higher it would disincentivize owning a car.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What happens if they pay out more than forecast?

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Then there might be a rate increase for everyone in subsequent years, but not your current contract.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

everybody pools together money at a much lower individual cost

Another example of this is would be public transport.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Another example of this would be a thousand things: Firefighters, police (not American), education, Healthcare (not American), defense, unemployment, childcare, pensions, roads...

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

defense

I don't believe in socialized nuclear deterrence, which is why I think every red-blooded American should own their own backyard hydrogen bomb.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

Or not to build homes in a place called Tornado Alley, for example.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Iirc, margins for insurance are actually extremely thin. Consumers almost always go with the lowest cost option, and since insurance is mandatory, they don't differentiate much on anything except cost. Insurance companies don't actually make money on insurance premiums. They make money by investing the float.