this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
6 points (100.0% liked)

dynomight internet forum

87 readers
1 users here now

dynomight internet forum

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dynomight@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I agree with you! There are a lot of things that present non-zero existential risk. I think that my argument is fine as an intellectual exercise, but if you want to use it to advocate for particular policies then you need to make a comparative risk vs. reward assessment just as you say.

Personally, I think the risk is quite large, and enough to justify a significant expenditure of resources. (Although I'm not quite sure how to use those resources to reduce risk...) But this definitely is not implied by the minimal argument.