this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)
People's Republic of Britain
82 readers
1 users here now
A community dedicated to documenting, discussing and critiquing government overreach from the UK Government in terms of censorship, freedom of speech and right to privacy and private communication.
Rules (literally 1984, I know)
- Not dedicated to one idea or the other. Censorship in general should be called out.
- Keep it on topic. Don't turn this into a discussion space dedicated to the ideas or things that the British Government may be censoring (Except for commentary in the comment sections, provided it's civil - we don't want people falling out here)
- Parody posts are allowed (like the Boris Johnson clubcard points meme or links to relevant Tom Scott videos) as long as they don't get too much
- Posts must be generally based around the UK and actions of the UK government. Articles about propositions by opposition parties and such are also fine. This community isn't set up to critcise on one specific political party
- Article titles mustn't be changed too much unless necessary to add context. When doing so, use brackets, except for when expanding abbreviations
- Try not to get arrested
- We are not responsible for loss of clubcard points
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The point is that it's mandatory. There is currently no mandatory ID in the UK
Yeah, I get that, but is just the case of "we're against it because it's mandatory"? Like, you're not against the concept of an ID, just the fact that it's mandatory?
Why is that? What's malicious about it?
Yes. The government has no business forcing us to use their mandatory ID for tracking us.
"Tracking"? How do you use an ID for tracking?
I mean, sure, digital ID would allow that in some way (although that's already fully possible with other means), but a physical ID?
When it's used to check into museums and use trains and online services just like China
There's a massive gap between "mandatory ID" and "like China", mate.
Most of central Europe has mandatory IDs. Nobody gives a fuck because nobody who checks them has the time to report anything anywhere, even if anybody required anything like that. It's literally only used to check the age of a person 99% of the time.
And nobody checks them when you want to enter a museum.
common case for ID use is when you lost your keys and need to break into your own home
Like Spain then, where you can't buy a metro ticket without ID
Probably due to taxing laws. Citizens get a discount, tourists don't. Or you get a discount dependant on your age, etc.
Also: the fact that you bought a metro tickets contains zero actionable information for any "agency". Great, you have a ticket. When will you use it, though?
And, again, the entirety of Central Europe has mandatory IDs for decades. Just look at how incompetent the police over there is to see how little it does for "spying" or "controlling the population".
Bah! Poland's communist government imposed upon them by the USSR made the IDs mandatory and they still got toppled by the student and worker underground. Where was this "control" then?
Yes it does. It links my identity to the locations...
My travel through the city is now in a database. It's the sort of thing that a authoritarian state would find very useful to track down dissidents.
I'm not saying that Spain's current government would use it in this way, but they've constructed a system that would be very useful to a future bad actor. It's naive to think governments will always be benign and never abuse such systems.
By the same token you we should be campaigning for everybody being fully anonymous and wearing a mask at all times.
Feels like throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Well I'm certainly against forced face reveal so facial recognition cameras can work. I think privacy is something we need to reclaim.