this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
221 points (95.1% liked)

politics

31231 readers
2104 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That section of the far right is basically why Kirk was doing a "comeback tour" they've been harassing him for years.

It's a safe bet she understands that the shooter was another faction of the far right and that if people keep talking about it, the well dries up. Because she's lived for years with their harassment

When right wingers think "a leftist" killed him, they give blindly

They figure out a right-winger killed a right-winger, and they'll all start picking sides.

trump is so anxious to push this, he's going to fuck around and people will hear what really happened. Especially since the shooter has zero reason to try for a plea deal now.

He's taking it to trial and going on the stand, because every politician involved has said they want the death penalty.

The shooter literally has nothing to lose.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's taking it to trial and going on the stand, because every politician involved has said they want the death penalty.

Is this speculation or has there been a statement?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

About if they're going to push for the death penalty? Yes, the governor and Trump have both explicitly called for it, and the judge told him it was on the table when reading him his charges

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I meant about Robinson taking the stand.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago

Oh... I misread that as taking a stand, but that seems unlikely seeing as he's just been provided a lawyer. That's a very bold move in a case like this, and this is negligently early in the process to decide that

With how much misinfo there is in this case, I wouldn't believe it unless it comes from the lawyer directly

[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What ever happened to the guy that grazed Trumps ear?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He was killed at the scene almost immediately...

The one who was going to shoot him on a golf course, I believe is trying to represent himself in court.

[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Didn't he turn out to be a right wing lunatic as well? Funny how his backstory was pretty much ignored by the media.