this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
104 points (96.4% liked)
Selfhosted
60177 readers
688 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil.
-
No spam.
-
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
-
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
HTTP 1.1 is more than good enough for serving a static website.
There is zero question about it. It will be absolutely fine for some dude's static website over a residential internet connection.
Same? HTTP/1.1 ran the entire internet for 20 years and is used by a ton of sites. It's fine for a personal website.
Obviously someone who has never actually tested 1.1 vs 2 vs 3 lmao