this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
612 points (95.3% liked)

Greentext

6712 readers
1764 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Taking away someone's intentional, roleplayed disability definitely falls under "infringing on someone's fun", though. If the player (not just the character) is also disabled and trying to represent themselves in the game, this goes beyond infringing on fun straight into lowkey offensive. I would never let this nat 20 work. Maybe it fixes the wheelchair or something.

[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 months ago

I believe they were saying that this is a situation where it does infringe on other player's fun

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 10 months ago

If I'm DM I'd say they cast the spell exceptionally well and... it does nothing. They can do something very well that doesn't do anything special.